goldprice.dev: page one beside bigger API brands

goldprice.dev is a gold and metals price API that we operate. We used the same analysis SearchSeal runs to find the rival-name and API searches it could realistically win, built pages for them and rolled out indexing in paced batches. Here are the observed numbers.

Check your site
Evidence trail
  • Google Search Console query data
  • Bing Webmaster Tools totals
  • Site AI-traffic log and signup attribution

An owner's case study, not a customer result

goldprice.dev is our own site. We chose the work, built the pages and read the dashboards ourselves. Nothing here comes from a SearchSeal customer, and we are not presenting it as one. We publish it as our clearest example of the method in use, backed by real numbers we can stand behind.

Finding the searches worth winning

The gold price API market has well known names already. Buyers search for them directly: goldprice.org, GoldAPI, Metals.dev and the gold endpoints of Twelve Data. A smaller site will not outrank those brands on their own names by accident, but it can earn a place on page one beside them when someone is comparing options.

We began with the category’s top sites and the queries people use to find them. For each query we asked three questions. Does the search mean the person is choosing a provider? Is page one made of pages we could match or beat on facts, such as free tiers, limits and coverage? Do we already get some impressions for it, which shows the search engine sees us as relevant? Passing all three made a query winnable. Queries that only wanted the rival's own login page were left alone.

That pointed at two groups: rival-name searches, such as a competitor's brand with "api" or "free tier" added, and plain API searches, such as gold price API in another language. The same pattern is what SearchSeal looks for in AI answers: the questions where a rival is named and you are not.

What we built and how it was indexed

We wrote comparison pages, alternatives pages and roundups for those queries. Each one answers the question the searcher actually has, for example what a rival's free tier includes and how goldprice.dev differs, with the facts in plain text and tables that both search engines and AI tools can read.

We rolled out indexing in paced batches from 12 Oct 2026, instead of all at once. Each batch went through Google Search Console, the Bing sitemap and IndexNow submissions.

The observed numbers

We checked all figures below on 18 Oct 2026 in read-only views. Each row names its source and window, because the windows are not all the same.

MetricObserved valueSourceWindow
Google clicks444Google Search Console, web search18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026
Google impressions14.3KGoogle Search Console, web search18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026
Google average position7.7Google Search Console, web search18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026
Queries with 10+ impressions averaging position 10 or better41 of 58Google Search Console, web search18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026
Bing clicks1,810Bing Webmaster Tools18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026
Bing impressions101,219Bing Webmaster Tools18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026
Referral visits from ChatGPT128Site AI-traffic log20 Sep to 18 Oct 2026 (WIB)
OpenAI search-bot requests4,103Site AI-traffic log20 Sep to 18 Oct 2026 (WIB)
ChatGPT user-triggered page fetches3,661Site AI-traffic log20 Sep to 18 Oct 2026 (WIB)
Perplexity search-bot requests2,339Site AI-traffic log20 Sep to 18 Oct 2026 (WIB)
External signups attributed to AI assistants64 of 460 (13.9%)Signup UTM and referrer20 Sep to 18 Oct 2026 (WIB)

In Google, 41 of the 58 queries with 10 or more impressions averaged position 10 or better. The example queries below are among them. Positions are averaged over 28 days; a query at 6.9 appeared both higher and lower. The only query where goldprice.dev averaged a top three position was its own brand name, goldprice.dev, at 1.1.

QueryImpressionsAverage position
goldprice.org5736.9
goldprice.org api3326.6
goldapi1768.5
goldapi.io free tier1026.1
twelvedata gold price api577.4
metals dev405.9
api giá vàng (Vietnamese for gold price API)375.2

Source for the query table: Google Search Console, web search, 18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026.

Bing was the larger channel in the same window, with 1,810 clicks from 101,219 impressions.

AI assistants and signups

The site logs its own AI traffic. Over 28 days to 18 Oct 2026, it recorded 128 referral visits from ChatGPT. It also recorded 4,103 requests from OpenAI's search bot, 3,661 page fetches triggered by ChatGPT users and 2,339 requests from Perplexity's search bot. Crawls and fetches are retrieval: the assistant reading a page. They are not citations and they are not visits from people.

In the same window, 460 external accounts signed up. We identified 64 of them, or 13.9%, as coming from AI assistants: 62 from ChatGPT and 2 from Google AI. Only UTM tags and referrers identify those signups. Other people may also have found the site through an AI tool without leaving that trail.

What this does not show

  • It does not prove the pages caused the results. These are observed numbers and before and after movement does not prove causation. Seasonality, rival changes and search engine updates also matter.
  • Most of the Google and Bing window, 18 Sep to 15 Oct 2026, came before the paced indexing rollout began on 12 Oct 2026. The table covers that period for the site, rather than the rollout’s effect alone.
  • Average position is an average across many searches. It is not a fixed rank, and it differs by country, device and person.
  • Bot requests and page fetches show that AI tools read the site. They do not show how often the site was cited in an answer.
  • We do not publish paid conversion numbers here. Signups are accounts, not customers.
  • One site in one niche is not a forecast for yours.

Who ran this work

We did this on a site we run, using the approach we build into SearchSeal. SearchSeal and goldprice.dev are owned and operated by Nusantara Ventures, LLC. Read it as an owner's account. The Narwhal case study covers a second site run the same way.

Find your next AI search win

Check your site