SearchSeal is Live

SearchSeal is live again, but it is not the product first described at this URL, and it has changed since then too. The original version polled AI assistants with prompts and turned their answers into brand visibility reports. It had no users and was retired. Today's product checks AI answers again, but ties them to page fixes and search data.

What SearchSeal is now

SearchSeal helps the owner review saved brand mentions and choose which page to fix. It currently sends tracked questions only to DeepSeek on a schedule and saves each answer with the brands named, their positions, rivals, and returned source links.

Optional, read-only Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools connections add search demand and clicks per page. SearchSeal ranks fixes for the owner's own pages, with drafts tied to the answers and search demand behind them.

The product truth rule

SearchSeal measures visibility as the share of saved answers that mention the brand. A mention names the brand; a returned source link identifies a page. SearchSeal keeps these observations separate, and explicit citation status is unknown. A human referral is evidence of a visit, not proof that crawling caused it. An observed crawler request does not prove that a page was indexed, used in an answer, or cited. Visibility comes from samples, not a fixed ranking.

What the product does not claim

SearchSeal does not track crawlers, site traffic, or human AI referrals. It compares AI visibility and search clicks before and after a fix, but cannot prove the fix caused the change. It does not guarantee citations, rankings, or traffic.

Current access

The same data is available through a REST API and an MCP server on every plan. Plans are Entry, Starter, Pro, and Max; see the plan details. The competitor suggestions need no account and offer possible rivals to review; they are not a measured visibility check.

This article remains as a record of the launch and its earlier changes, from prompt polling to crawler evidence and then analytics. The product has since changed focus to AI answers and page fixes.

Why this correction is public

The old launch article earned a stable URL and became part of the product record. Deleting the history would hide the change, while leaving either earlier description in place would mislead readers and crawlers.

Keeping the URL with corrected copy makes the transition explicit: the name remains, the earlier single-purpose descriptions do not, and every current feature claim must match the live product.